Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Meters. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and Individual Choices, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The area out of connection inside the people mating. Overview of Standard Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson https://gorgeousbrides.net/da/single-slavic/, V., & Crawford, An excellent. (2002). Internet contradiction reviewed. Record out of Public Items, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, R., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet contradiction: A social technical that reduces social wedding and psychological really-being? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.Yards., & Areas, J. M. (2001). Matter, timing, and lifetime of marriages and you will divorces. Current Society Reports, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional investigation regarding intimacy, appeal, and you will partnership: Research the latest presumptions of your triangular principle away from like. Mental Profile, 90(step 3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.step three.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Feeling ideal throughout the starting tough: Public comparisons within this close relationships. Diary of Identification and you may Personal Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A good., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The newest implicit knowledge away from close competition. Record from Identification and Social Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.
A beneficial. (2001)mitment and you may relationships fix components
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automatic inattention so you’re able to attractive choices: The fresh evolved therapy out of relationship maintenance. Evolution and you may Peoples Choices, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential analysis of conflict and you may agreement into the troubled and you may nondistressed marital people. Record regarding Consulting and Logical Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A beneficial., Eco-friendly, A great. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Dating formation online: What’s the large appeal? Record off Public Items, 58(1), 9–30.
The advantages of confident illusions: Idealization and the structure from pleasure when you look at the romantic matchmaking
Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-evaluation aim during the close relationships: A model of all over the world enhancement and you can certain confirmation. Inside P. Noller & J. An effective. Feeney (Eds.), Expertise ents regarding the study of pair interaction (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge College or university Push.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the consumer-specialist thread from the lens of attachment theory. Psychotherapy: Idea, Look, Behavior, Studies, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). New personal monitoring program: Enhanced awareness so you’re able to social cues since a transformative a reaction to social exemption. Into the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The brand new public outcast: Ostracism, societal difference, rejection, and you can bullying (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Therapy Drive.
Enter, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). Global and you will specific relational habits in the exposure to personal connections. Log regarding Identification and you may Social Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A beneficial., Tran, S., ). Accessory and you can pointers trying to in the intimate matchmaking. Character and you will Societal Mindset Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you will specific attachment representations within the adulthood: Is there a love?. Record Regarding Social And private Relationship, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. From inside the J. Harvey & A good. Wenzel (Eds.), Close close relationships: Restoration and improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An excellent. D. (2000). Projection individually perception certainly one of spouses while the a function of the fresh new similarity inside their shared experiences. Identification And you can Public Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Ramifications of salience of extrinsic perks on preference and you may enjoying. Record away from Personality and you may Social Therapy, 38(3), 453–460.